Calling a website that happens to host static content in the same repo as its PHP source a "release of a software project" really seems like a stretch.
>Calling a website that happens to host static content in the same repo as its PHP source a "release of a software project" really seems like a stretch.
Why was I downvoted heavily for this, without even a single comment explaining why I'm wrong? This was a serious comment, and I still believe what I said, so it's rather rude to be treated this way.
And again, on a comment asking for someone to actually explain why they're doing this? This is really disappointing, Hacker News is usually a lot more well-behaved than this.
It is not even a string too.