|
|
|
|
|
by nopcode
3691 days ago
|
|
So people are asking the government to protect themselves from their own stupidity?
She should've read the contract before signing. Everything that differentiates a woman or man is "sexist",
it doesn't mean its bad or only impacts one gender.
(There are rules unique for men too). |
|
The point is, the clause in the contract about high-heeled shoes should be null and void.