| Today, while talking to my teammates about promotion and pay raise, some of them said they were happy when their salaries were lifted to match the market price before the CTO has gone. To give you some details, last year our CTO told us he was going to ask to get pay raise as our salary don't match the market. However I didn't get any news since then. But today I discovered some people got it and not others, why I have no idea, I could go to ask the CTO himself but unfortunately he just left. So, I feel like I am betrayed and leftover mainly the pay lift is not work related, my feeling is I have to get pay raise too as I deserve it as much as my teammates and at the same time feeling it's not worth it, even it's better off to move on "to quit". Any advice is welcome. Update: I cannot agree on "underperforming issue" as the monthly and annual report show I am doing a real good job and got the annual pay raise related to work performance. What I did not get is the exceptional pay raise to match the market and even to be fair comparing to 2 teammates that got the pay raise they don't do at all a better job than mine and we know it. And why I was told to get a pay raise in the first place if he knew I won't have it. I would be happy to accept it if the real reason was due to the performance but all signs don't show that. |
The pay that we've given out has always been related to performance and determined by market value/supply and demand.
The coddling answer is to say: Oh, that sucks... maybe he doesn't like you. And that may be true. But it may also be a cause of you needing to work harder/longer, more efficiently, less mistakes, etc... we can assume there is always a nefarious reason but it is just as likely that there are very real performance reasons for the raise.
I'm sure there are people out there who have worked alongside people that are lazy and get paid just the same, and it irks them. That isn't fair. Pay should always be based upon performance.