It may that they did not add it for a reason also. There are a lot of edge cases because many potentially dirty concepts are made up of words that are not bad alone. For example a text can have both "girls" and "nude" in it without being vulgar, but if it has the phrase "nude girls" the chance for it being pornografic is much higher.
jätkä - meaning literally "dude"
hatullinen - hatful
lahtari - an outdated word; I doubt many young people know the meaning/context of it. It was an insulting way to call the people on the white side during our civil war in 1918
pehko - thick hair
Having been on several projects that required such lists, I'm glad that such a repo exists, but be aware that it is just the tip of the iceberg. Stakeholders emerge from the woodwork: such and such on the delivery team had a terrible experience before so we should include these words, HR and marketing have company-specific lists to merge in, some of the producers have unsettlingly precise and revelatory requirements ...
https://github.com/shutterstock/List-of-Dirty-Naughty-Obscen...
Now what exactly is the thing it refers to?