[avalaunch]

Yeah, but are the decreased amount of police calls due to Target's loss prevention officers (and other such prevention mechanisms), or is it simply due to the fact that they cater to a different demographic? It would certainly be an interesting experiment - if Target removed their loss prevention officer, and/or Walmart added them, how much would change? I have no idea, but I suspect the demographic plays a pretty large role.

[fisherjeff]

Completely agree - there's no chance lack of on-site enforcement accounts for 100% of the difference, but I'm sure the effect is still large. Theft of a $3 bottle of eye drops, to take an example from the article, just seems SO easily resolvable without police intervention. Even without loss prevention officers.