Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by friendzis 3697 days ago
If I understand this model correctly you fail to admit that there are at least 3 distinct types of users: developers (full access), users (read-only), issue trackers (wiki/issues only). And this model is geared toward a very specific type of organization with a relatively low number of users/trackers compared to developers.

Epic's example is just silly, but nevertheless the world is not black and white. I guess there should be a large number of organizations with multiple CI/CD agents each using distinct credentials for each target. Or examples of software houses requiring client access to issue tracker/wiki.

I guess GitHub analysed their data and made the best decision, but this really does not seem geared toward Enterprise in traditional sense of the word.

Some $vendors (just using familiar terms here) somewhat cover the gray areas pricing $x per unit, where unit is e.g. 2 users or 5 repos, whichever is higher.