|
|
|
|
|
|
by wyager
3693 days ago
|
|
|
What does that mean? I'm not sure how you could get more imperative than IO in Haskell; that's literally how the language deals with effectful imperative sequencing. Which abstraction does elm use? As far as I can see, there is no abstraction. This is the problem. Effectful code in elm looks syntactically just like pure code. |
|
|