[maxander]

If you want to die to assist the population-control efforts, be my guest. : )

More seriously, what would happen if the average number of children per family was 3.5, rather than 2.5 [1]? Probably nothing absolutely catastrophic, and that's roughly what would happen in a pessimistic scenario of an ageless society- instead of simply generating a batch of new people that will later reproduce, there's a batch of new people and the original parent. Maybe some outliers will just keep having children constantly (until they just physically give out- that would be an extreme strain), but I'd think most people would allow a decade or two between families.

More more seriously, birth rates are declining drastically in highly developed countries, to the point that many places are worried about population decline. Overpopulation is a problem in developing nations, but realistically, anti-aging won't make a big difference there- they're already typically dying of more preventable things than old age.

[1] Source; that old apocryphal statistic we all know from the 90s or something. Its probably different now, but I'm too lazy to look it up.

[exception_e]

relevant documentary: "No Sex Please, We're Japanese" - Link is https://vimeo.com/80542212 (this appears to be the director's account, so I don't think it's a random/pirate upload)