|
|
|
|
|
by WA
3698 days ago
|
|
500 MB could be enough. As I said, if I need a bigger plan, unoptimized websites have economic consequences. I heard mobile-first is a thing. It doesn't seem too far stretched to assume that users and thus potential customers might be interested in fast-loading websites. See, what this boils down to is this: People use Adblockers, because they're tired of all that shit that's consuming their bandwidth (at least on mobile). Content publishers complain about people using Adblockers. But they're not willing to get the technical side of their content consumption platform right in order to accommodate their very visitors. They cry foul but are part of the problem obviously. Unfortunately, I don't get to see what links to avoid (size-wise) before I download all the bloat and waste my bandwidth. |
|
The growth of website size has been fairly steady, if anything the growth has flattened over the last year or so. It is up to the infrastructure to keep up with that.
In the last year or two we've had the introduction 4G with 2-4 times the speed of 3G and you expect to have the same usage allowance?