|
|
|
|
|
by technion
3699 days ago
|
|
I feel there are two very contradictory views on HN. The first of these, is that anything safety critical needs to land on an RTOS.
The second of these, is to avoid C. Both of these have reasons behind them and appear to make sense. Leaders in the RTOS space appear to be QNX and vxworks. Suitable languages people raise are Rust and Go. Based on some Google time, neither of these platforms support either of these OS's. Multiple "Introduction to vxworks" documents are all exclusively in C. In terms of accessibility, safe languages are far easier for someone to get their hands on, test to death, than some of the OS's recommended. |
|