Yea, no. That's not how science works, it's not a popularity contest. If you have both a reasonable method of action and can back it up with actual reasarch you become the default until actual evidence suggests otherwise.
Unless you mean that in the most narrow terms, as in literally just popularity.
Sorry, that's exactly how it works. You've pushing a claim. The claim needs proof. The burden is those pushing the claim, not the people pointing out that it isn't proven.
You might think that, but young post grads do a literature review not a survey. It might seem morbid, but science is often said to progress when the old guard dies off.
That's not to say it's going to win as the only explanation, just that it needs to be disproven not ignored.
Unless you mean that in the most narrow terms, as in literally just popularity.