[bronxbomber92]

Since writing the paper is expected to take no more than an hour, given the software is already written, I wonder if they're worried about receiving a flood of submissions. Perhaps it's less of a problem since reviewing a paper should take much less time given their length?

[a_bonobo]

I feel it may be a problem for them since it looks like they try to reproduce the program's setup/workflow, which is (in my experience) more than bioinformatics reviewers usually do:

>Authors are strongly encouraged to include an automated test suite covering the core functionality of their software.

> OK: Documented manual steps that can be followed to check the expected functionality of the software (e.g. a sample input file to assert behaviour)

You can see the checklist reviewers go through in any of the issues here:

https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues

[tkt]

Yes, the paper won't take long to write if the software already meets the criteria in the Reviewer guidelines http://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines

Most scientific software probably doesn't already have all these components in place. It would be a great problem to have, to have a flood of submissions!