[jordan0day]

> Since there are infinite things about which we are wrong

That's... ahem... wrong.

How could there possibly be an infinite number of things "we" (humanity, I presume?) are wrong about, given that there have only been a finite number of human beings with (as far as I know) finite life spans?

[jcoffland]

It's quite simple. I am assuming there are an infinite number of things to know. That which we do not know we are wrong about.

[db48x]

That's not a very good assumption; the universe has a finite size and therefore cannot contain an infinite amount of information.

[szemet]

If the universe cannot contain infinite amount of information then it follows that there are infinite knowledge we cannot know - simply because we cannot store it anywhere (in brains or computers or anywhere).

For example: exact prime factorization of all natural numbers, etc...

Of course this is true only if you accept induction. So you can still back off by declaring yourself finitist* ;)

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finitism

[jsprogrammer]

The observable universe appears to have finite size. I don't know how you could prove it though.

[nitrogen]

The observable universe is effectively defined to be finite in size. The proof comes from the speed of light.

[jcoffland]

Assuming a big bang is the source of all matter. Our observable universe may only be a spec in something much larger with out violating any of our "laws" of physics.

[jcoffland]

Assuming the observable universe is everything there is is not a good assumption.