|
|
|
|
|
by Jasper_
3700 days ago
|
|
The systemd maintainers were one of the first ones to put together a technical proposal and do a lot of the implementation work for the UsrMerge, in a way that was reusable across distros. systemd itself does not depend on being on a UsrMerge'd system, and otherwise, the proposal does not have anything to do with systemd. From https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseFor... "Note that this page discusses a topic that is actually independent of systemd." |
|
As of 2016, the position is that whilst there is still code in some of the program to handle a split /usr, a significant part of the system (in particular Plug and Play device management) now references /usr and depends from it, to the extent that it is already a requirement that /usr be always present: i.e. that it either be on the root volume or be mounted by /init (on the initramfs) before it invokes systemd.
* https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2016-Fe...
Lennart Poettering is indeed now pushing for systemd to impose a similar requirement for /var .
* https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2016-Fe...
* https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2016-Fe...