|
|
|
|
|
|
by yazaddaruvala
3695 days ago
|
|
|
To me, as a user (rather than, as a dev), I don't really care about the "Single Responsibility Principle", and the difference between Rustup and Cargo seems artificial. They are both binaries I need to install that help me manage my Rust application's dependencies. The only arguable difference is that Rustup manages "build dependencies" where Cargo manages "code dependencies". However, the tools I've used, managed both those concepts, and did so seamlessly (I wish I could share more). Meanwhile, I don't believe Rustup.toml currently exists (I'd love to be corrected). Since other people like the difference between Cargo and Rustup, I'm happy to change my Wishlist 1. 1. I wish Rustup had a Rustup.toml file, such that my git repo could manage the currently used version of rustc. Primarily for consistency across teams, and seamless transition when I `cd ../<other_application> && cargo build`. |
|
|