|
|
|
|
|
|
by ipsin
3694 days ago
|
|
|
This doesn't seem like a case of tunnel vision. The evidence and circumstances of the theory do seem to point towards the husband. Of course, the trial may reveal Jace's innocence, but there seems to be enough evidence that I don't think "lazy police work" applies in this case. Also: "Jace's attorney and the prosecutor assigned to his case could not be reached for comment." |
|
|
That's unfortunate. The system is suppose to prove his guilt, and assume innocence by default.