[kartan]

This argument looks like it can also be applied to even malware. If I put something illegal doesn't has the judges right to stop the distribution of that app in the country? Another question is if what Watsapp did should be illegal. But if the judges can't stop internet companies from doing something illegal who do you thing should do it?

[necessity]

No, he does not have that right. By that same logic brazilians shouldn't be allowed to visit websites from any other country where there's a discrepancy with brazilian law. With a government like ours next thing you know we have our own Great Firewall.

This kind of thing can't even be enforced, being so easy to bypass.

[gcb0]

except you are wrong. e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countries_blocking_access_to_T...

every country treats certain content as criminal as they wish. Where the servers are is just a minor detail.

[necessity]

No it's not a minor detail, because it's easy to bypass, specially if its a decentralized service. Nevertheless its an outrageous retrenchment of our freedom.

[tremon]

No it's not a minor detail, because it's easy to bypass

All laws are easy to bypass, what's your point? Ever tried to go 60 in a 30km/h zone? Lack of 100% enforcement does not make a law useless.