|
|
|
|
|
by jbrukh
3700 days ago
|
|
Sorry, my fault for not being clear. I didn't mean that digital equity would empower employees to circumvent company policies. Rather digital equity and governance systems [1] that are currently being built around blockchain and decentralized projects simply take a much more egalitarian and healthy approach to distributing ownership in the first place. And, hey, if you want to use equity as an incentive for retaining employees, you still can do that using (for instance) a smart contract in a way that is fair and not concentrated as a power in the signature of a single person. At the end of the day, traditional private equity whether it is an investment or as compensation has a lot of problems, as I'm sure HN readers on here know very well. [1] Most forward-thinking real world example: http://daohub.org |
|
Honestly, the best way to decentralize ownership is to lead by example and start a hundred-billion dollar company that distributes ownership. If the next Google has decentralized ownership, that would be a model for other companies to follow. Right now, there is no incentive for any company to do anything nontraditional here.