[BigJono]

No, you shouldn't.

Wages aren't a hierarchy, they're supply and demand. The only reason why someone earning 150k would have to justify their wage to someone earning 50k is if the person earning 50k wasn't afforded the same opportunities as the person earning 150k.

[Hytosys]

Wages are absolutely hierarchical. The people who have higher wages have higher rank/status/authority.

You just pushed the blame off to the market, which needs the exact same moral justification.

[jessedhillon]

There are any number of examples of people who have low income, but much higher rank, status and authority within their circles than the average engineer has in his or her. If you are perceiving one continuous spectrum along which every human alive is ranked according to these measures, I would suggest that you might have a naive view of the world.

[Hytosys]

I wasn't being reductionist, that is not my world view; I recognize many different hierarchies. But wealth is an extremely important dimension and the one under examination here. Simple example: people with higher income hire literal wage slaves to do their gardening and cleaning. Low income people don't have nearly such authority.

[oarsinsync]

+1 for having a cleaner. I pay her above the recognised living wage for the city though, so I don't feel bad about myself