[angerman]

It feels to me as if GitLab is pushing (major) security updates very often. Now there are two reasons I can think of this happening:

- They are very open about security vulnerabilities and fix them fast.

- There are some inherent defects in their software that cause these security vulnerabilities to come up so frequently.

I'd like to believe it's the first.

EDIT: formatting.

[sdesol]

> Now there are two reasons I can think of this happening

They are also churning at a pretty insane rate due their release schedule. I did a very basic analysis of their repos at

http://gitsense.github.io/blog/motion-bubble-charts.html

And this is the churn for this month in their master and 8-7-stable branch

http://imgur.com/PfyFrzS

I also included the https://github.com/atom/atom master branch (blue line) for comparison.

In order to get a better picture what what's going on, I'll need to cross reference the churn to security issues, but this isn't something my tool will support until later in the year.

[Sephr]

Did you delete http://imgur.com/PfyFrzS ?

[sdesol]

Yeah it had some inaccuracies.

[jobvandervoort]

Wow, this is super cool! Thanks for doing this!

[jobvandervoort]

I think it's because of a number of reasons:

- We're very open about vulnerabilities and fix them fast

- We have a large install base, in particular >100k Community Edition installations

- Our source code is open and not obfuscated. It's easier to mess around in it for anyone interested, even when it's running.

- We regularly have security researchers perform audits

- Our rate of change (as mentioned by others) is very high

[connorshea]

You probably perceive GitLab as having more vulns because we're a very open company, whereas most other companies keep it mostly to themselves.

Relevant: https://twitter.com/tenderlove/status/725370404513017856

[sytse]

This question got picked up by InfoQ. See the reply of our VP of Engineering in http://www.infoq.com/news/2016/05/gitlab-impersonate-vulnera...

[INTPenis]

Only thing I can add to all the other reasons already mentioned is the most obvious one that gitlab has received a lot of press and exposure during the last 2 years and this in turn has made the number of eyes on the code grow.

As with any software project; there will be bugs.

As with any open source project; there will be eyes on the code.

[fabulist]

Why not both?