|
|
|
|
|
|
by maaku
3707 days ago
|
|
|
> I stand by my statements. The community, or even a handful of researchers haven't come up with a competent path to AGI. That's indisputable. The keyword there is competent. You're making a subjective evaluation. Given your CV you must surely be aware that Goertzel has a 1,000 page book (two volumes, actually) laying out in great detail his roadmap to human-level intelligence. The leaders of other major projects in this space have their own ideas which they talk freely about at the AGI conferences, and are written down to varying degrees. |
|
|
Notice a pattern?
Meanwhile, in deep learning (and FWIW I don't think any deep learning researchers are under the illusion deep learning provides a path to AGI), there are:
working systems that outperform humans at narrow visual tasks (image classification, segmentation, etc.), a working Go bot, early prototype systems that caption images, the list goes on and on.