|
|
|
|
|
|
by lollipop25
3706 days ago
|
|
|
Promises alone, good for me. Promises + generators, they just created a monster. I'll probably be sticking to just promises for a while. JavaScript is becoming terrible these days with all these foreign concepts being pulled in. It's not like the language doesn't work without them. It even gets better, ES7 has the async keyword that's totally different from generators, but is geared to do the same thing. So you now have 4 ways to deal with async stuff: vanilla callbacks, promises, generators and async functions. --- On a side note, the people who lead JS included `const` in the spec. Now people are using `const` to denote value holders that won't and should not change values, happy ever after right? Wrong. The same people that are leading JS are making fun of people using `const`, saying that you're probably brain-dead to need `const` to keep you safe. That's the kind of people "leading" JS. |
|
|