|
|
|
|
|
|
by commenter1239
3709 days ago
|
|
|
It was alleged, that the bike with the motor, was not her bike but a friend's bike, that was left in their tent, and mistaken to be the althlete's bike. But also supports your statement, if this wasn't the athlete's bike, why go through the effort to hide the switch or mechanism at all if you're not competing? On the flip side, if the bike was actually a friend's bike, what do you say to that friend that got you banned? |
|
|
She admits that it WAS her bike. But that she sold her bike to a friend who then installed a motor, brought it to her event, then her "helpers" mistakenly brought it out to the pit area.
See, her original explanation that it was just a friend's random bike didn't wash with it being painted like her other race bikes are. This new explanation of it being one of her bikes that she sold to a friend, now fits in with the narrative she is trying to spin.
Honestly the whole story is nonsense.