| >Did you see the vote where the 367 lower house members declared their opinion? Yes, I did. It was indeed sad. All of them, pro and against the impeachment, made a shameful spectacle. > So it all boils downs to differences of opinion. That may not be a reason to impeach a president! No, it all boils down to : a fiscal fraud commited by the president, an economic crisis, political inability of Dilma, crescent lost of popular support. Do you really believe that Dilma has the capacity to "do something good for Brazil" ? Dilma had 5 years to do that and the result is a inflation getting high, unemployment getting high, GDP getting low. Even Lula complained about her destroying the good things he had achieved. Sorry, but with the lower house and senate against Dilma ANYONE has more chance of that than her. >Do not forget that foreign investors are allergic for political instability. Impeaching a chosen president without a good reason is the best way to keep foreign investors away. The political instability are already set, the impeachment is a way to stabilize things (new elections is another). > Impeaching a chosen president without a good reason is the best way to keep foreign investors away. There is reason, and keep Dilma will definitely keep foreign investors away. It's the economic crisis that keep them away and she is unable to change that. |