[Detect]

Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) for cattle is about 10, pig 3, sheep 5, and chicken 2. That means we could feed about 10 times more people per hectacre on grains than using that grain as feed for beef. Ruminants are important for nutrient cycling and other ecosystem services, but far from efficient as a food source for humans. They are best utilized on marginal land where agriculture isn't ideal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feed_conversion_ratio

[hga]

Yeah, in the US at least, the normal pattern is to raise cows on pastures, sometimes out in the dry west fantastic acreage of it, 1,000 acre ranches can be considered tiny, 10s of thousands are not uncommon, and/or including grazing rights.

Then they're sent to a feed lot for some period of time to fatten up.

Ah, from the article you linked: "However, comparisons of FCR among different species may be of little significance unless the feeds involved are of similar quality and suitability."

So cattle might be more efficient than appears at first glance, since as ruminants they're initially fed stuff you can't feed other animals (ADDED: including humans), especially "on marginal land where agriculture isn't ideal", or perhaps as part of a crop rotation cycle. Alfalfa is a 3-for, a rotation cycle that's not e.g. corn or soybeans, a nitrogen fixer, and tasty food for cows.

And all the above isn't the best for our topic at hand, for that alfalfa and such isn't stuff we can digest, nor is silage from corn leftovers, so it mostly feedlot cow food we could redirect to humans.

[Detect]

I agree with you that it's mostly feedlot grains that we could redirect to humans, and that feedlot grains is a surprising amount of what we produce in total.

"More than half the U.S. grain and nearly 40 percent of world grain is being fed to livestock rather than being consumed directly by humans"

http://news.cornell.edu/stories/1997/08/us-could-feed-800-mi...

[hga]

And in the US, corn burned for ethanol, which is 40% or so of it. Now plenty of that food value is passed on to animals, the largest byproduct is "distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS)", which is 31% by weight of the original corn, so it's not entirely wasted on that boondoggle today, but all of it could be redirected. Europe also has biofuels programs, doesn't it?

The title of your link: "U.S. could feed 800 million people with grain that livestock eat, Cornell ecologist advises animal scientists"

What, and give them type 2 diabetes?!?!!

Seriously, a lot of the usual suspects should reconsider their animus towards animal husbandry in the light of the increasing evidence the move to a low fat, high carbohydrate diet caused and is causing untold morbidity and mortality.