[mhkool]

The facts are that the media are opposed to the president and that they are an important factor when we consider the opinion of the people.

It is not a matter of believing, but looking at the facts. Dilma is right when she says that since the beginning of the second term, congress has not done anything good.

And you should know that there is no evidence whatsoever that the president committed the crime that she is accused of. Nothing! not even a single shred of proof that she did anything against the law.

Presidents may not be impeached because other politicians do not like her. A president is choosen by the people to serve the country and the other politicians must respect the wishes of the people.

[RicardoR]

> And you should know that there is no evidence whatsoever that the president committed the crime that she is accused of. Nothing! not even a single shred of proof that she did anything against the law.

People who defend Dilma want to bring Petrobras and Lava-Jato operation to tell that there is nothing against Dilma. But the impeachment is not about that. Is about fiscal fraud and there is proof about that.

> A president is choosen by the people to serve the country and the other politicians must respect the wishes of the people.

What about the 70% of rejection ? 70% doesn't approve her, that's is the people you are talking about.

[felipebrnd]

Actually there's evidence, they are not saying that they didn't did the fiscal maneuver, they are saying that other governments did the same and not got impeached.

I agree with your point about the impeachment, it's a political maneuver.

We are stuck with two options (and both are bad):

1) 2 years of stagnation and political fight inside the government

2) 2 years of maybe a recover or a complete disaster

[edit: formatting]