|
|
|
|
|
by mariuolo
3708 days ago
|
|
Perhaps someone can clarify a point for me:
I'm under the impression that whatever the foundation or project that adopts Thunderbird, it would have to be half-rewritten to get rid of its legacy (Gecko/XPCOM/XUL) codebase. Is that correct? Has anyone estimated how much time/money/manpower that would require? |
|
https://careers.mozilla.org/position/ohUW2fwT
IMHO Thunderbird should replace: - Gecko with Blink - XPCOM with normal plugins (I don't think anyone is making any real use of the unique features of XPCOM, e. g. the universal binary interface) - XUL with QML/WPF/alike.
Qt would provide a full-stack alternative: - Gecko -> QtWebEngine - XPCOM -> QPluginLoader - XUL -> QML
Maintainability and performance would increase exponentially.