[gizmo]

He's a real crook in a system that's awful. It's not either-or in my book.

So I agree he's not the root cause. He just pushes the existing framework to its "logical" conclusion. But only if "Logical" means being as ruthlessly exploitative as possible. Even the other sleazebag drug CEOs don't go this far, so Shkreli is uniquely contemptible.

But yes, ideally anger should be directed to the pharma industry and health insurance as a whole, not to Shkreli the individual.

[koolba]

> He's a real crook in a system that's awful. It's not either-or in my book.

The "either-or" is figuring out which one to go after and where to change things. If you only go after the Shkrelis, it's all for show and probably is a waste of tax payer money as he'll get off the hook for not legally doing anything wrong. People need to wake up and go after the real problem and replace the healthcare system and corrupt officials that perpetuate it.

[ZenoArrow]

Why do you only have to go after one side? Both sides (the corruptor and the corrupted) can and should be held accountable. Holding Shkreli accountable is more than just a token gesture, and no charges would've been brought against him if no laws were broken.

[koolba]

I fail to see what laws he's broken. If you're going to allow a "free market" healthcare industry, this is the result. Being a dick isn't a crime. Neither is being a price gouger.

[ZenoArrow]

> "I fail to see what laws he's broken."

Take a look then...

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-are-the-charges-again...

[koolba]

> Take a look then...

> http://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-are-the-charges-again....

Did you actually read that article?

It has nothing to do with price gouging prescription drugs. That's for an unrelated securities fraud charge for juggling hedge fund money. I'm not saying he's not at fault in that situation (honestly not sure) but it's unrelated.

[ZenoArrow]

If you want something closer to daraprim:

http://www.legalreader.com/distribution-network-for-daraprim...