|
|
|
|
|
by pessimizer
3717 days ago
|
|
> Why does government get to make laws and decide what's good and what's bad? We do ask this. It's the entire reason we vote in representative democracies. It's absolutely nothing like the question you're replying to. > In any society, we have some basic rules of 'good' and 'bad', and it's totally ok to test a website on those measures. The basic rules of societies for what is 'good' and 'bad' about websites is something that you have entirely invented here in order to make an empty, unnecessarily dismissive argument. Here's my answer: Google decides because our governments have abdicated responsibility for regulation or enforcement. Therefore, the responsibility is taken up by the groups in the best position to exploit it for money. |
|
And you settle with a government which agrees to 'your' version of good and bad. But somehow, Google is not entitled to its opinion even if for trying to possibly make a safer internet.
> you have entirely invented here in order to make an empty, unnecessarily dismissive argument
On the contrary, I'd say you have invented your reasons for why Google is doing it (i.e., 'to exploit it for money') without any evidence. Of course, Google is here for profit, doesn't mean there's an evil motive for everything they do.
Of course, your judgement of good v/s bad is for good, and their judgement of good v/s bad is for bad. ;)