|
|
|
|
|
|
by BurningFrog
3716 days ago
|
|
|
I think the argument is that US government financed health care that only pays for maybe half the population is already more expensive then paying for 100% of the population in other countries. So it's a stretch to imagine that having the US government take on many more patients would lower costs. |
|
|
Sure, given your current system, it won't. So change your current system.