[NinjaViking]

And do you think that somebody who packs his drone with C4 and aims it at passenger aircraft is going to care if he is violating a flightpath? Forbidden is not the same as impossible.

[Avshalom]

Right but 'it is illegal to put a drone in this airspace' gives us permission to shoot down anything in a flight path before impact, including the ones with C4.

[arjie]

What weapons does one use to shoot down a toy drone? You can't miss because on the other side, there are people, and if it hits, it shouldn't lead to dangerous parts all over the runway.

[Avshalom]

I think right now the idea is generally a bigger faster one with a net.

[arjie]

That's a clever one. More importantly, it makes for an amusing picture.

[kaybe]

Not as cool as hunting birds though, which is being tried too. Drones are probably more practical, I guess.

[Piskvorrr]

Now you have two problems, as in "Engine 1 ate the drone, while Engine 2 ate the eagle."

[etherael]

I've seen that, but wouldn't a laser actually be more reliable / faster?

[Avshalom]

Well like arjie said, you don't really want flying debris near people/runways

[etherael]

And maybe the energy necessary to actually vaporise entirely would not be the kind of thing one would be wanting to punch up into the atmosphere willy nilly.