[barrkel]

Companies are made out of people who interact with other people. Why would people want to work for a company that acts like a dick?

Not only is it self harm, but it also pollutes the public space, and the public has a say in that too. We don't yet live in an autocracy.

I can see we're probably not going to come to any resolution. I think you believe more strongly in absolute property rights, while I believe that if you want absolute property rights, you should relocate outside a city where you don't have neighbours. Neighbours make all the difference. They have to suffer your outward appearances. If you're going to put up a hostile face, they're going to be hostile right back, and there are more of them than there are of you.

[nitrogen]

Trees pollute the public space? If mixing neighbors and trees causes problems, then the problem is with the neighbors, not the trees. Trees are awesome. Assuming sustainable low-pollen species are chosen, why not cover every building in green?

[barrkel]

Trees don't pollute the public space; a view of inaccessible trees pollutes the public viewscape.

[nitrogen]

The same argument can be made against anything. I might have a car you can see. But you can't access it. Does this pollute the public viewscape? You might have windows or balconies that I can see, but I can't access them. Does this pollute the public viewscape?