Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by codehusker 3722 days ago
CoreOS has done a lot of work to avoid a monoculture of Docker containers, and I think we all benefit from the interchangeability of different implementations/runtimes.

The future of containers just keeps getting brighter and brighter.
1 comments
teacup50 3722 days ago
Isn't this just a Linux monoculture? It's not like you can run most containers as-is on a platform like OS X without actually virtualizing Linux itself.
link
jahewson 3722 days ago
Not necessarily. You need a platform which supports Linux syscalls, but you don't need Linux per se. Unlike VMs, containers sit above the kernel so you're tied to its interface but not its implementation. For example, see Solaris' LX Branded Zones.
link
jclulow 3722 days ago
At Joyent, our Triton cloud stack is built on illumos (nee Solaris) LX branded zones. We also have a Docker-compatible remote API, so not only can you run unmodified Linux binaries in containers, you can do so using the regular Docker client CLI!
link
teacup50 3721 days ago
Dropping POSIX in favor of a syscall ABI implicitly defined by Linux's implementation is a pretty substantial backwards step.
link
gshulegaard 3722 days ago
While not true yet, Docker is working on this by replacing the underlying LXC with their own secret sauce (at least last I checked). I suspect this is a result of their partnership with Microsoft (http://www.zdnet.com/article/dockers-unikernel-acquisition-t...). They were also moving towards creating proprietary and unique management tools before CoreOS started putting pressure on them.

Also notable is Docker isn't just containers, but they also have strong design opinions and container "philosophy".

link
fapjacks 3721 days ago
Docker runs natively on FreeBSD as of release 11 (which does require the new Linux 64-bit compatibility facility). It uses jails to achieve the same effect and in fact uses the very same images available on the default Docker hub. Also Docker has released beta engines for both Mac and Windows. So no, it's not a Linux monoculture even when considering only Docker.
link
SEJeff 3721 days ago
It would work fine on OS X if that operating system actually had equivalent control group or namespace functionality. OS X / Darwin lack these features, hence the boot2docker VM.
link