I'm asking that data be consulted to test whether the assumptions and assertions being made are accurate.
As to the rest of your comment, they're words, grammatically correct. But they make zero sense, both in context of this discussion, and in the sequence you've presented them.
The "sun rising" isn't real, it's an artifact of the rotation of the earth.
And the 'what if' of it not occurring isn't 'real' because all historical evidence shows that your hypothetical of the sun 'not rising' on April 14, 2016 has virtually zero chance of occurring.
I'm asking that data be consulted to test whether the assumptions and assertions being made are accurate.
As to the rest of your comment, they're words, grammatically correct. But they make zero sense, both in context of this discussion, and in the sequence you've presented them.
The "sun rising" isn't real, it's an artifact of the rotation of the earth.
And the 'what if' of it not occurring isn't 'real' because all historical evidence shows that your hypothetical of the sun 'not rising' on April 14, 2016 has virtually zero chance of occurring.