|
|
|
|
|
by DatBear
3723 days ago
|
|
It's not just that the first clarification was more useful. The first clarification was correct. The comment said the renders are beautiful, obviously meaning rendering in in the 3D rendering[1] sense. The clarification stated that they weren't rendered in that sense because the author used photoshop, which doesn't render in that sense. Then the second clarification stated that rendering also meant drawing... and while it does, it also has a specific meaning within 3D representations which doesn't really fit here. Nothing to call anyone a nazi over but the second clarification wasn't needed or useful. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_rendering |
|