Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mikegerwitz 3719 days ago
The author quoted Shuttleworth:

> The native availability of a full Ubuntu environment on Windows, without virtualization or emulation, is a milestone that defies convention and a gateway to fascinatingly unfamiliar territory.

"Ubuntu environment" is the key there. Microsoft doesn't need "Linux" unless they're planning on replacing their own kernel with it. Microsoft here is depending on the software running atop of the kernel: in this case, the GNU operating system---which is more than just a set of GNU programs[0]---which brings all of this software together.

Granted, all the talk has been primarily about GNU Bash and other GNU software.[1]

Yes, they're running software compiled for the kernel Linux by providing translating system calls; they could also do that for any other kernel that hackers want to compile their software for, should it become immensely popular. But the rest of the Unix stuff is separate.

[0]: https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu.html

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/

1 comments

If we end up with fully comatible gnu/linux and gnu/windows, that's still awesome, maybe even better than ending up with only linux variants.
Not if it's harmful to the development of a fully Free ecosystem. Unless Windows becomes fully Free - which would be a huge, unprecedented change - its users are forced to accept whatever compromises Microsoft makes on their behalf.