[brudgers]

I wasn't trying to be unfair with the analogy, my apologies.

My purpose was to drill into what phrases like "not having a destination in mind", "new experience", and "not caring" mean and expose the assumptions about human behavior under pinning them.

It's a thought experiment. The scenario is simple and concrete and reduces the likelihood of wishful thinking about human behavior. By lowering the risk/reward ration, it is easier to see the economic model.

The first question then becomes, why would Ubering to random restaurants work or not work?

And the second question is, how is the market Wanderlust wants to tackle similar to and different from the Ubering to random restaurant market?

A third question, if Ubering to random restaurants is a viable market, given the greater economic activity and higher recurrence of restaurant dining, would it be a more scalable model, and if it isn't what makes Wanderlust's market more scalable?