|
|
|
|
|
by tomlock
3725 days ago
|
|
The idea that you trust your judgement on the magazine ratio is probably one of the reasons that this analysis is useful. Are you sure that you aren't just biased against noticing men's magazines? Or perhaps there are a lot of magazines with language specifically gendering the reader as male that you consider neutral... |
|
The main point is that it is not a problem if some product category caters primarily to a specific demographic. What would be an issue would be a significant part of the population being neglected. However, there is no reason why that shouldn't be fixable by the market alone.
I can think of several TV series that cater specifically to women, with lots of women talking.
How can we be sure that the 2000 movies the article talks about randomly selected movies, not movies cherry picked to show the desired result?
Even if we pick random scripts that are available online, there might be an inherent bias? For example, maybe older scripts (from the 50ies) are more likely to be online?