This is the exact point where you start to see that the Go creators are ok with hackery as long as it works and doesn't make the overall design too complicated.
It looks like we agree Go has "special comments", not "executable comments".
I recognise that Go' special comments can be seen as a hack, but honestly they are not so different from Rust's attributes or Haskell's pragmas, which can look clunky too.
I recognise that Go' special comments can be seen as a hack, but honestly they are not so different from Rust's attributes or Haskell's pragmas, which can look clunky too.