|
|
|
|
|
by whatnotests
3726 days ago
|
|
Because in the absence of law and order, when the social contract is broken we as humans feel the need for justice. If justice could be served using legal channels, then it would. As it is in the Free World. Given the parent's examples of why legal channels are unavailable, vigilantism is the automatic next best thing. Legal channels often serve as the path of least resistance compared to vigilante acts in other cases. Their ineffectiveness in cases like this push people to do what they feel they must. |
|
I don't know if I would call legal channels "ineffective" and I'm not anarchist enough to say that you "must" be a vigilante when they don't work. But yeah, sometimes it's really enjoyable to get back at people.
There's nothing wrong with being morally wrong. (Just as long as you're not hurting anyone, in my opinion.)