[isido]

With golang, it is incredibly easy to get productive fast. It's like modernized, safe C with good standard library and trivial deployment. Those are pretty good selling points for getting stuff actually done.

Using Haskell for similar stuff is more tedious, even if a actual coding is more fun. I can see (and sometimes feel myself) the cognitive dissonance here.

[sievebrain]

I think the issue here is that you're comparing Go to C and Haskell.

C is decades old. Haskell was designed to help you write correct programs, rather than simplicity of use or productivity (or that's how I'd characterise it).

If you compared Go to C# or Java 8 or Scala, it'd probably look a lot worse. Deployment isn't so difficult that Go has any advantage in my experience: install a JVM on the server, ensure your build system is producing a fat jar, run it. Done.

With Capsule you can even make self-executable JARs that have a little shell script attached. Then you can run the program like any other UNIX app. chmod +x and ./execute it. Fully self contained, and can even update itself automatically.

[jjuel]

I use C# at work, and I use Go at home. I really do like C#, but there is a reason I am using Go at home. I find I am more productive, and can develop better code faster with Go even though I am very new with Go.

[sievebrain]

I'm curious which parts of Go you find more productive than C#. Visual Studio slows you down?

[ultramancool]

> Using Haskell for similar stuff is more tedious, even if a actual coding is more fun. I can see (and sometimes feel myself) the cognitive dissonance here.

I don't think the same could be said for say, Scala or F# which offer many of the same paradigms but in a more flexible way though.