[lettergram]

(1) It is not very well established, but there is evidence supporting it[1]. The problem is EEGs previously were tens of thousands of dollars. We intend to do a study as soon as we have any sort of funding, and we already have people willing to participate, a facility, and a University of Illinois professor advising us [2].

(2) We plan to initially target therapists/psychologists as a way to monitor patients remotely. We will also sell direct-to-customer, and possibly connect them to a therapist/psychologist remotely, or they can use our software without the therapists (this is a less likely route, but we are already receiving emails about it).

Believe it or not, the adoption barrier isn't that high, because people are already trying things such as yoga, meditation, therapy, etc. This is essentially the same form of treatment, just in a different medium. We already have people signed up to pay for our trial, and have people email us regularly.

With a study to back it up, we believe we should have customers. However, we don't know if we wish to go this route. The end goal is to use the therapists initially and eventually automate the entire mental health pipeline.

[1] http://synaptitude.me/blog/literature-overview-of-using-neur...

[2] https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Eut-aii72ch7nySpB_oGDLiJx_X...

[braja]

Thanks for your response! The references cited in your literature overview seems to focus on neuro feedback for ADHD, which is a great market. I remember reading recently that pediatric ADHD is on the rise and that it's super underdiagnosed - I'd imagine an effective diagnosis+management solution in this specific space to be extremely lucrative.

Also, I don't know if you'll get this from others, but simply saying "mental health" made me immediately think of depression and related issues. My suggestion would be to refine your problem and solution statement to narrowly talk about your initial target segment (ADHD, autism, etc.) of the broader mental health space.

Good luck to your team!

[lettergram]

Thanks for the suggestion, I definitely agree!

Also, ADHD is usually considered one of the most over diagnosed and under diagnosed diseases. That is to say, you have a high false-positive rate and a high false-negative rate.

That's actually one of the largest issues with mental health today, it's basically a psychologist just saying, "well you probably have this," it's not really scientific. Where are the measurements, why is it so mystical? We wanted hard analytics and that's why we are building this.