Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
DigitalJack
3726 days ago
This is just a phonetic misspelling of the contraction "should've" which really is pronounced "should of"
3 comments
jjuel
3725 days ago
However, should've is a shortened version of should have so I think the point still stands.
link
colejohnson66
3725 days ago
Ain't the English language great when we can have multiple contractions such as "couldn't've"
link
mirimir
3725 days ago
Or "should a" ;)
link