[mbrutsch]

> Foos is clearly a serial sexual offender

When the "victims" have to be informed, decades later, that they even are victims, it makes you wonder.

[someone7x]

To be fair, one of the victims was murdered because of the what he knew and did with that knowledge.

[ceejayoz]

You can be victimized without being aware of it.

Crimes against an infant, a comatose patient, etc. don't cease to be crimes.

[bredren]

Arguably, anyone living in the tax systems of those exposed in the Panama Papers are victims of the accused' possibly illegal, likely unethical tax avoidance.

[thaumasiotes]

What would make legal tax avoidance unethical?

[russnewcomer]

Sorry, it doesn't make me[0] wonder. It's still at the very least a moral failing.

If it were encryption keys he was snooping on and not sex, would your response be different?

[0]edit - I used the wrong pronoun (you) here in my initial post.

[cpncrunch]

Yes, it's still morally wrong, but only on the level of a white-hat hacker who hacks into a system, snoops around a bit, but doesn't alter anything. I'm sure a lot of us here have done that...