|
|
|
|
|
|
by return0
3732 days ago
|
|
|
It's not a journal, or it's a different kind of journal. I guess it would be like doing the whole review process in a very public way. Would that be worse? I don't know ... has anyone tried it? I think we are heading that way anyway, the open access publishers are pushing the envelope here by making peer review more and more public (publishing reviewer names, or comments along with the paper). |
|
|