[dllthomas]

This is needlessly rude.

I believe I've understood the issue, but if I've misunderstood then I feel extra need to comment, that my misunderstanding might be clarified.

From my first reading of what you'd written, tome seemed spot on.

On careful re-examination (after reading this comment), I think when you said "Things you don't receive warnings for:" you did not mean to say that you can write that code and receive no warnings (a reasonable interpretation), but that the warnings would not read as directed at the points you raise (also a reasonable interpretation) - which (you note) are substantially more important than "this is generally a good idea."