|
|
|
|
|
by jhkaghjkga
3733 days ago
|
|
Because any (possibly security-relevant) update to a library would mean that all software linking it statically has to be rebuilt. In reality that of course doesn't happen, so programs linking statically or including their own versions of shared libraries never get security updates for the included libraries. |
|
A couple of years back Microsoft discovered some kind of issue with their redistributable dlls.
They patched Office etc, but could only offer a scanner that would check each and every dll to see if it was of a vulnerable version. And asked users to pester third party software providers for updates if the scanner found any.