Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by justJanne 3735 days ago
> in what real business is $7/user/mo too expensive for anything?

The whole Open Source community? Volunteer driven, donation funded projects? Non-Profit charities, mostly composed out of volunteers?

3 comments

> The whole Open Source community? Volunteer driven, donation funded projects? Non-Profit charities, mostly composed out of volunteers?

None of those are businesses. Maybe I should have clarified but I meant a business as one where employees work for an organization that derives value from their work (say $A), the organization pays the employees some form of compensation ($B), and the expectation is that the value derived by each employee is more than the compensation (i.e $A > $B).

In that model I don't see many places where ($A - $B) < $7.

Yes, they aren't for-profit entities.

But they still require history, easy to use chat systems, easy integration into Dev systems, etc.

That's what was better about IRC: you can self-host and get all of slacks features for very cheap.

And you still can, right? There are still plenty of alternatives for those who can't or don't want to pay for Slack.
It gets a lot harder when all the integrations only support webhooks or even only Slack.
Slack offers its standard plan for free if you are a non-profit org. But you need to be an org; you can’t just walk in and claim your free plan if all you have is a GitHub repo and a (even large) community.
That’s not really the case for most projects that would wish to use it, though.

Not everyone is KDE e.V.

They said business. Of course things are going to be different for organizations that either have no revenue, or depend on donations.
But when a lot of tools and integrations only work with Slack, then open source projects often don’t have the time to reimplement them just for their own projects.

The network effect leads to lots of open source projects having to choose slack – which, in turn, means they end up having to pay, without having revenue.