Presidents aren't immune to the law. But it's theoretically possible that she would be convicted and impeached, and then pardoned by Vice President Bill Clinton after he takes office.
This whole thread is a case study for why we just shouldn't host discussions like this on HN. There are a million better places to do it than here.
Clinton is probably not legally eligible to be Vice President --- a position that, were he to occupy it, would give him no authority over any prosecution (except possibly an impeachment trial --- over which he would preside, but not control).
Clinton is definitely not eligible to serve as President, even if he is the Vice President at the time his President is impeached. The next in succession after VP would be sworn in as President.
You'll have to verify your phone number to sign up, which will make moderation more effective (hard to make an additional account after getting kicked out).
If it grows and that isn't enough to keep it respectful, I will add a $1-2 signup fee for new users.
I'm also going to be spending most of my time recruiting quality people to join the discussions.
Subsections (a), (b), and (d) [every succession category] of this section shall apply only to such officers as are eligible to the office of President under the Constitution.
That all applies when there is no Vice President to act as President. None of it applies to the scenario here, which is wholly covered by the 25th Amendment.
"In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President."