|
|
|
|
|
|
by nickpsecurity
3738 days ago
|
|
|
That makes a lot of sense. Yeah, you should consider renaming it to something more clear. Maybe even change it into several commands with better names. Your docs frame the issue as whether it allows dynamic/JIT stuff or not. So, static-only, allow-dynamic, or allow-jit come to mind. |
|
|
That's what I've been pushing for – I don't think it make sense to continue to have all these compilation-related flags baked into the interactive `julia` command.